Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 132 2-Core 260 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 759 79% 635 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.3% Very good	Lighting 92.3 Reflection 126 Parallax 83.9 75% 101 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 78.5 Splatting 71.5 70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 430 417 405 405 404 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 391 Mixed 377 SusWrite 416 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 27.6 152% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 33.3 99% 212 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB 2,551 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 25.8 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 37.5 SC Mixed 27.6 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	144	23.8"	1280 720	SAC2444 DP

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 55%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	221x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	42x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	53x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	42x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	41x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	33x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	24x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	19x

RAM
CM4X8GF2666C16K8 2x8GBCorsairBench 79%, 838 samples	55x
BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 80%, 2,551 samples	21x
CM4X4GF2666C16K4 2x4GBCorsairBench 81%, 458 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $409

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16