| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | DELL 0X501H |
| Memory | 13.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100204 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 08 '21 at 21:35 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
72.9%
Very good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
49% 402 Pts
|
36% 575 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
85% 110 fps
|
82% 100 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT49D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 117 110 120 120 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
30% 134 MB/s
|
80% 27.3 MB/s
|
60% 106 MB/s
|
|
Cl1-3d128-q11 NVMe LITEON 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 22301111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 106 101 101 108 107 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
150% 681 MB/s
|
110% 39.6 MB/s
|
262% 363 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
233GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 102 104 105 104 MB/s
|
60%
Good
|
68% 92.5 MB/s
|
147% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.8%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
28% 9.97 GB/s
|
59% 68.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 455 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 313x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 19x |
| Xeon X5550IntelBench 67%, 1,065 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
| GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |