Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 19:35
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 203
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 654
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2486) ≥ 4GB; RTX3060Ti DUAL OC 8GB GDDR6 PALIT
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 116% Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$44
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 135 202 168 186 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 711
Write 191
Mixed 256
SusWrite 184
73% 335 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 25.9
117% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 290
225% 315 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 228%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 195 192 191 189 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 182
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 192
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
916GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 146 146 145 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 132
Write 138
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 144
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 26.7
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 13% 104 103 5 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback