HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3674
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 101
45% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 147
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 51 6.4 12 127 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 179
Write 166
Mixed 150
SusWrite 77.4
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 8.7
27% 8.17 MB/s
DQ Read 40.4
DQ Write 25.2
DQ Mixed 40.1
28% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ57 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback