Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 23:12
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 65
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 877
84% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 36.2
27% 36.4 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 290 290 293 285 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 491
Write 419
Mixed 419
SusWrite 289
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 29.3
111% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 134
109% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 126%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 148 114 123 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 167
Write 149
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 141
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 104%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
72GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 56.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 57.7
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 24.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 22.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 1R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 27% 45 260 146 144 27" 1920 1080 AUS27AF VG278
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback