Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	21 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 69.3 1-Core 106 2-Core 201 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 578 56% 463 Pts	64-Core 761 47% 761 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 26.7 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 26.3 22% 28.1 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 14.5 Splatting 11 10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB 7,894 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: STAS1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 298 193 229 251 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 336 Write 275 Mixed 298 SusWrite 238 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 27.4 80% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 215 194% 295 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 113%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 608GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 441 429 441 435 441 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 378 Write 388 Mixed 342 SusWrite 437 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 26.6 88% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 345 262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x16GB 12,742 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 29.9 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 25.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	871x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	715x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	544x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	456x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	425x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	404x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	155x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16