Today's hottest deals

Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 13:15
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 183
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 336
43% 326 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 100 31 101 9.8 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 383
Write 265
Mixed 247
SusWrite 84.9
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 18.2
64% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 72.1
DQ Mixed 44.2
46% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 55%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
201GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 421 426 428 427 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 408
Mixed 349
SusWrite 414
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 31.9
115% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 256
213% 308 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
95GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 73
Write 72.8
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 58
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 59%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 2GB
0GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.7
10% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R748G2606U2S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 19.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 10R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 52% 29 259 191 60 0" 1920 1080
Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback