Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming SLI/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190315
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '21 at 02:13
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 216 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 410 53% 399 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 41.7 Parallax 38.4 30% 39 fps	MRender 36.4 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 27.8 27% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MG04ACA100N 1TB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 839GB free (System drive) Firmware: FJ5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 179 174 178 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 126 Write 113 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 171 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.9 215% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB 3,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 9.6 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 27: 0R 8G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
27%	24%	45	308	221	60	22"	1920 1080	ONN0101 100002480

History: Score 24: 1R 5G 4B | Score 38: 7R 1G 0B | Score 27: 0R 8G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming SLI/ac Builds (Compare 677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming SLI/ac

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	180x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	150x
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	149x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	62x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	46x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	40x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	25x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	24x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	32x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	22x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $594

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16