Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '21 at 15:01
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 82 2-Core 180 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 228 26% 205 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.6% Average	Lighting 60.9 Reflection 61 Parallax 82.5 50% 68.1 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 67 Splatting 45 46% 58.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 120GB 731 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 83 69 67 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 424 Write 224 Mixed 280 SusWrite 90.1 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 10.8 83% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 18.1 48% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 382GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 161 158 159 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 147 Mixed 91.4 SusWrite 158 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GB 3,530 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 7.6 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.8 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 52: 5R 5G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
52%	15%	149	284	200	60	21.6"	1920 1080	PHLC079 Philips 227EL

History: Score 24: 4R 0G 4B | Score 52: 5R 5G 12B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	377x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	251x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	274x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	175x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	104x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	71x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	55x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	87x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16