Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H

Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120822
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '21 at 02:52
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 94.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 227 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 547 59% 470 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% EVGA(3842 3797) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 206 Reflection 223 Parallax 222 168% 217 fps	MRender 260 Gravity 168 Splatting 135 147% 188 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 78 90 84 84 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 442 Write 210 Mixed 211 SusWrite 104 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 19 82% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 76.7 DQ Mixed 106 99% 159 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 543GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 195 224 233 233 231 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	82.1% Excellent	Read 261 Write 252 Mixed 252 SusWrite 212 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 49.4 159% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 199 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 285GB free Firmware: MEAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 67 69 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 72.3 Mixed 43 SusWrite 67.5 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 271GB free Firmware: MEAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 65 64 69 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 62 Write 50.8 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 65.2 40% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 266GB free Firmware: MEAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 66 70 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 60 Write 70.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 67.6 44% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 384GB free Firmware: MEAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 71 69 72 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 79 Write 84.8 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 70 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 641GB free Firmware: MEAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 77 76 79 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 85 Write 86.5 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 77 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 66%
ASMT 2105 8TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 4TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 32 32 31 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 147 Write 152 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 32.6 124% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 92%
ASMT 2105 8TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 32 32 32 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 100 Write 110 Mixed 61 SusWrite 32.7 99% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 87%
ASMT 2105 5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 650GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 82 81 83 82 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.7% Above average	Read 172 Write 172 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 78.6 157% 123 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 137% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 72%
ASMT 2105 5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 319GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 82 83 84 84 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.4% Average	Read 144 Write 144 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 80.8 134% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 116% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 72%
ASMT 2115 10TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 6TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 134 145 147 147 149 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.9% Very good	Read 191 Write 200 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 139 197% 151 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 75%
ASMT 2115 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 130 141 145 145 145 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.5% Good	Read 142 Write 144 Mixed 66 SusWrite 136 163% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 248GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 67 68 68 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.5% Below average	Read 81 Write 88.8 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 67.4 96% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 171GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 9.9 9.2 9.2 9.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.3% Poor	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 11.4 100% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 1,487 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 18.1 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 18.1 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z77X-UD5H Builds (Compare 1,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H - $380

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	570x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	248x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	212x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	77x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	74x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	73x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	48x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	41x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	35x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $849

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16