Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 03:40
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$78
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 793
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.4% Above average
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 83.9
Parallax 75
58% 76.9 fps
MRender 78.2
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 65.5
58% 72 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 266 251 237 225 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 490
Mixed 408
SusWrite 266
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 59.7
202% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
96GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 79 81 79 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 94.3
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 79.7
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
210GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 80 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 69.2
Write 64.6
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 79.9
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$210
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 38
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 21.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 5R 5G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 34% 62 348 290 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACI249A ASUS VS247
History: Score 32: 3R 4G 5B | Score 35: 2R 5G 10B | Score 51: 5R 5G 11B
Typical GA-X99M-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $753
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback