| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190807 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '21 at 12:25 |
| Run Duration | 268 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47%
Average
|
50% 96 Pts
|
47% 372 Pts
|
27% 430 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0597) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.5%
Average
|
47% 65.3 fps
|
46% 57.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
60.9%
Good
|
69% 24 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
18% 222 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 43: 5R 4G 6B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43% | 48% | 31 | 102 | 6 | 240 | 27" | 1920 1017 | WAM2380 SG24240 |
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 43: 5R 4G 6B
Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,123 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 3,219x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,507x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $130Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 461x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 727x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 566x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 517x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $353 |