Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 14:53
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 259
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 702
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 131
Parallax 120
93% 122 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 125
Splatting 109
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 43 44 47 46 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 457
Mixed 344
SusWrite 73.5
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 52
184% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 148
146% 228 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
392GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 128
Write 112
Mixed 76
SusWrite 99.6
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
954GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 111
Write 113
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 114
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
291GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 108 108 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 144
Write 101
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 107
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
314GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 69 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 79.8
Write 77.8
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 68.7
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 7R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 41% 41 259 198 60 63.7" 5760 1080 MSI3BA4 NV Surround
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 55: 7R 5G 5B
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $972
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback