Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 19:46
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 167
2-Core 329
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,259
113% 953 Pts
64-Core 2,286
142% 2,286 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 64.2
54% 67.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 56.1
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 284 286 286 285 283 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 453
Mixed 449
SusWrite 295
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 53.2
175% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
465GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2290 606 612 611 611 614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,550
Write 2,394
Mixed 1,762
SusWrite 891
425% 1,899 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 84.6
279% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,085
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 1,035
775% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 289%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
465GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1807 1046 803 801 802 800 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,547
Write 1,825
Mixed 1,689
SusWrite 1010
394% 1,768 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 82.7
271% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,082
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,036
778% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 294%
Great: 355%
Seagate Expansion Desk 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 241 235 233 237 242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 236
Write 229
Mixed 191
SusWrite 238
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 1.6
48% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 5.7
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
3% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 70
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 41.2
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 0" 1280 720 DM2350A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback