Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	114 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200907
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '21 at 19:57
Run Duration	380 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$506 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 131 56% 92 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 840 62% 565 Pts	64-Core 2,776 172% 2,776 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.3% Very good	Lighting 87.1 Reflection 104 Parallax 69.5 71% 86.9 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 83.5 Splatting 74.9 72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 485GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1412 1921 1969 1945 2002 1844 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 596 Write 1,842 Mixed 1,922 SusWrite 1,849 356% 1,552 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 45.4 142% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 642 DQ Write 528 DQ Mixed 731 507% 634 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 488%
Ocz-vert EX4 512GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 12GB free Firmware: 1.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 317 Write 356 Mixed 256 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 13.3 46% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 204 154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 111%
Mtfddak5 12MAM-1K1AB 512GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 92GB free Firmware: 0A09 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 258 256 257 258 254 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 366 Write 249 Mixed 245 SusWrite 257 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 12.2 46% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 51.2 58% 98 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 74%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 82GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1161 1115 1121 1138 1137 1114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,147 Write 858 Mixed 908 SusWrite 1131 227% 1,011 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 12.1 39% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 714 DQ Write 717 DQ Mixed 642 502% 691 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 18GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,167 Write 884 Mixed 882 217% 978 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 12.7 42% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 711 DQ Write 671 DQ Mixed 1,027 679% 803 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 315% 197GB free Firmware: 1B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 885 886 852 882 891 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,122 Write 866 Mixed 949 SusWrite 880 214% 954 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 13 47% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 716 DQ Write 564 DQ Mixed 859 583% 713 MB/s
Poor: 210% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 392%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 7GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 54.2 Write 55.2 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 57.4 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 262GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 12.2 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 18.9 16% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 156% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3600C18D4/32GX 4x31.8GB 469 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 46.3 MC Write 42.5 MC Mixed 42.4 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.1 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 36.5 84% 29.3 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 150%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	30	27.9"	1280 720	DEL40F0 DELL S2817Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,160x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	869x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	868x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	311x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,807

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16