Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 23:42
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$280
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 155
2-Core 304
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,098
106% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,504
101% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$260
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 82.6
50% 68.5 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 66
Splatting 44.9
52% 57.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OWC Mercury Electra 6G SSD 480GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 94 82 71 72 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.7% Very poor
Read 99.1
Write 68.4
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 84.3
18% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.7
15% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 66%
Kingston A400 480GB-$44
85GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 151 147 116 109 105 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.6% Very poor
Read 63.6
Write 63.4
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 126
17% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 5
18% 6.43 MB/s
DQ Read 48.3
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 76.4
54% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 103%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$97
357GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 77 65 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 53.8
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 67.8
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 73%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
447GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 80 73 69 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 79.6
Write 64.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 73.7
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 29.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 30.8
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 17: 1R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 20% 46 109 6 200 27.7" 1920 1080 ACR0585 Acer XB272
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $853
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback