Fujitsu FMVD0400B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu FMVD0400B  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU JIB75Y3
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 09:01
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 182
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 326
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 8.9
6% 7.9 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 86 73 48 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 228
Write 161
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 89.6
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 23.6
80% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 139
118% 171 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000NM0095-2DC10C 1TB
551GB free
Firmware: DB34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 180 174 179 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 181
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 182
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
258% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GRPFD120700000004 99U5403-159.A01LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5A56 24MP56
Typical FMVD0400B Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVD0400B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback