MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '21 at 13:21
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 177 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 597 56% 463 Pts	64-Core 855 53% 855 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5 Parallax 5 3% 4.73 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8.9 9.7 11 36 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Read 1.7 Write 13.4 Mixed 2.3 SusWrite 24.5 8% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0 18% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 68%
Mass Storage Device 250GB 1,340 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 48GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 13 13 13 13 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.72% Terrible	Read 28.8 Write 28.5 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 11.9 26% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.72% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 30.3 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 23.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	21.5"	1280 720	ACR0273 Acer P227HQV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	44x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $101Bench 68%, 93,718 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	23x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	8x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16