Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion AZ237AV-ABA e9270t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion AZ237AV-ABA e9270t  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 23:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 160
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 357
39% 308 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
MSI(1462 1910) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.4
3% 2.6 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.6
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M128C 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 34 106 43 15 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 240
Write 216
Mixed 224
SusWrite 61.5
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 10.8
64% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 0.7
37% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AZ237AV-ABA e9270t Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AZ237AV-ABA e9270t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback