Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 05:55
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 83.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 267 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 533 8-Core 904 87% 719 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% EVGA(3842 4667) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 166 Parallax 156 143% 166 fps	MRender 189 Gravity 143 Splatting 118 119% 150 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt256g TOSHIBA 256GB 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0108ADLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 141 229 359 288 345 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 798 Write 356 Mixed 320 SusWrite 260 96% 434 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 52.7 158% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 654 DQ Write 45.4 DQ Mixed 273 218% 324 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 157%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 449GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1019 1344 1374 1353 1388 1352 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 2,014 Write 1,918 Mixed 1,660 SusWrite 1305 388% 1,724 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 66.5 217% 74.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,418 DQ Write 1,085 DQ Mixed 1,147 886% 1,217 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 435%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 608GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 55 55 63 60 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 33.6 Write 59 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 58.3 37% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.1 102% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$60 93,353 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.1% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 19.8 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.6 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	511x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	498x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	355x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	222x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	275x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $792

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16