| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190703 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 12 '21 at 08:53 |
| Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.1%
Above average
|
56% 96.5 Pts
|
41% 318 Pts
|
28% 444 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.4%
Poor
|
22% 27.2 fps
|
20% 25.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 296 303 304 304 303 MB/s
|
||||
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
640GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 165 176 175 175 MB/s
|
94.1%
Outstanding
|
91% 125 MB/s
|
115% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
BUFFALO HD-PCTU2 500GB
32GB free, PID 01d9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
5.43%
Terrible
|
19% 14.2 MB/s
|
7% 0.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
63.4%
Good
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
36% 112 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | SAM0A59 S24C570 |
Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,548 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 924x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 374x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 273x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 524x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 340x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 304x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |