Colorful B85AK-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardColorful B85AK-PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150730
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 20:45
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 159
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 284
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 1822 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 49.7
Parallax 0.3
0% 16.7 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 28
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 40 45 44 48 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 92
Write 86.3
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 46.8
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G Kingston 9905403-038.A00G 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 4R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 36% 44 345 284 60 20" 1600 900 GSM4ECA E2041
History: Score 25: 2R 2G 9B | Score 38: 4R 3G 9B
Typical B85AK-PRO Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Colorful B85AK-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback