Neousys Nuvo-4000 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNeousys Nuvo-4000 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardNeousys NVS-3000
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20051206
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 14:52
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QE
U7E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 433
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.33
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 28.6
12% 21.1 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 26.4
23% 27.9 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3ME3 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S17411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 150 137 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 394
Write 150
Mixed 149
SusWrite 145
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 3.9
38% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 23.5
25% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3SH12082XH12AA 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 9 60 27" 1280 720 DELD067 DELL U2715H
Typical Nuvo-4000 Series Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Neousys Nuvo-4000 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback