Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3218AL7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3218AL7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140424
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 165
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 421
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 20.9
17% 22.4 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.2
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2-power SSD2042A 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 20 57 32 34 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 409
Write 349
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 60.7
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 71.6
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 1.3
38% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 91%
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB
64GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 156 84 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 231
Write 197
Mixed 200
SusWrite 103
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 22.9
95% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 149
111% 146 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
198GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 6.9 7.7 64 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 1.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 47.7
10% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 56 80 1 60 23" 1920 1080 HWP3064 HP E231
Typical 3218AL7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3218AL7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback