Today's hottest deals

Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G73Sw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 17:05
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 116
57% 90 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 310
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2048) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.57
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 7.2
6% 8.17 fps
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.6
7% 8.05 fps
Poor: 6% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 60 38 40 35 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 40.3
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 37
24% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
844GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 99 100 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 110
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 99.8
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB
233GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 29
Write 21.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 24.9
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 8GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO139E
Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback