Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H270M-Gaming3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170425
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 19:17
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700T 7,380 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 161 54% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 354 37% 297 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 22.5 Parallax 17.4 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 22.5 Gravity 21 Splatting 15.1 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0106A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 270 296 226 109 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 313 Write 297 Mixed 275 SusWrite 207 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 15.8 66% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 45.3 73% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 81%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 807GB free Firmware: JB0OA3W0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 120 121 120 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 118 Write 107 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 120 69% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.8 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 6R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	39%	46	56	5	30	23.8"	1920 1080	ACR075A VG240Y V

History: Score 18: 3R 0G 3B | Score 48: 6R 3G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	35x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	34x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	5x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	5x
KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GBKingstonBench 82%, 206 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16