Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 21:59
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 678 64% 529 Pts	64-Core 1,142 71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 159 Reflection 157 Parallax 144 130% 153 fps	Gravity 120 Splatting 108 100% 114 fps
Poor: 116% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 317% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1471 2171 2211 2212 1510 1482 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	327% Outstanding	Read 2,506 Write 2,292 Mixed 1,828 SusWrite 1,843 476% 2,117 MB/s	4K Read 59.7 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 78.8 259% 88.9 MB/s	DQ Read 823 DQ Write 658 DQ Mixed 707 538% 729 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 327% Great: 390%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$90 7,966 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 9GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 83 87 90 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 99.6 Write 110 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 87 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 107%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$90 7,966 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 35GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 91 92 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 97.3 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 89.8 60% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 107%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 7TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 250 247 252 249 248 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 104GB free Firmware: 1AN10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 50 61 56 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 30.1 Write 37.2 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 51.9 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 1,521 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.3 8.4 8.4 7.5 8 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 6.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 8.1 11% 9.18 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 13.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 92 44% 92 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	240	31.5"	1280 720	SAM7058 LC32G7xT

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)