Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T1400 9 User benchmarks, average bench 29% None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	23.5% Poor	Memory 44.5 1-Core 17 2-Core 16.5 20% 26 Pts	4-Core 17.6 8-Core 17.1 2% 17.4 Pts	64-Core 17.5 1% 17.5 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS723216L9SA60 160GB 711 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC2ZC50B SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 46 57 56 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 43 Write 46.3 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 53.4 32% 43.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 43%
MXT-USB Storage Device 4GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 8816 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 17.7 Write 10.5 Mixed 7.5 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 69% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.3 7.9 6.9 8 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.14% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 8.8 Mixed 15.4 SusWrite 8 17% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.1 64% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.14% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.09% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 1.5 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.09% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16