PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z240 SFF Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 802E |
Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190902 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 28 '21 at 10:10 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 125 127 126 127 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
466GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 130 130 131 131 125 MB/s
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
78.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 359x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 109x |
Xeon E3-1225 v5IntelBench 74%, 3,017 samples | 103x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 213x |
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 101x |
Quadro K1200NvidiaBench 13%, 4,005 samples | 78x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $180 |