Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3212AV1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3212AV1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory7.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 185
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 471
47% 385 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 60.9
46% 62.3 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 55.1
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 371 384 396 398 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 372
Write 373
Mixed 289
SusWrite 360
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 31.1
109% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 160
143% 210 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
425GB free
Firmware: GH2OA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 117 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 117
66% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Kingston 9905474-040.A00LF 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3212AV1 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3212AV1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback