Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime28.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 15:39
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 140
58% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 334
35% 280 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 55.8
35% 48.5 fps
MRender 45.8
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 32.6
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 390
Mixed 270
79% 356 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 41.9
141% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 41.3
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 53.4
47% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Intenso Sata III 120GB
57GB free
Firmware: Q0824C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 188 190 191 191 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 404
Write 357
Mixed 347
SusWrite 184
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 41.3
139% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 51.7
44% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 90%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
50GB free
Firmware: M0MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 188 189 191 191 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 323
Write 376
Mixed 286
SusWrite 184
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 30.6
105% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 36.2
33% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 94%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
270GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 64.9
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 58.9
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback