Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 21:07
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$178
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 170
2-Core 339
104% 196 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,262
115% 963 Pts
64-Core 1,573
97% 1,573 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gainward(10B0 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 40.1
34% 42.2 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.3
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 98 88 106 111 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 254
Write 132
Mixed 196
SusWrite 97.9
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 42.6
158% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 123
96% 130 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Samsung PM830 128GB
37GB free
Firmware: CXM05H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 302 305 307 301 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 469
Write 308
Mixed 278
SusWrite 298
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 25.9
103% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 129
107% 160 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
300GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 55 71 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 132
Write 127
Mixed 91
SusWrite 67.9
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C18D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 29.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 30.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback