Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '21 at 15:25
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 85 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 173 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 582 55% 456 Pts	64-Core 831 51% 831 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 470 941 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Asus(1043 0533) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.11.3 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.2% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 57.2 Parallax 64 33% 53.9 fps	MRender 58.5 Gravity 48.4 Splatting 41.5 40% 49.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 224 166 81 94 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 468 Write 390 Mixed 345 SusWrite 141 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 5.5 66% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 98.1 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 190 135% 167 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 403GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 149 149 149 149 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 146 Write 136 Mixed 82.6 SusWrite 148 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H 500GB 1,432 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: HDFD2C SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 62 64 77 71 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	268x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	143x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	63x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16