Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 12:34
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$229
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 241
75% 141 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 898
81% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,852
115% 1,852 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 3730) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 121
Parallax 139
113% 133 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 133
Splatting 112
113% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,106
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,207
352% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.4
203% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 654
494% 670 MB/s
Poor: 185% Great: 284%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 848 810 798 810 806 809 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 803
Write 818
Mixed 771
SusWrite 814
181% 801 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 44.6
139% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 479
313% 364 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 139%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 146 134 149 148 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 153
Write 139
Mixed 97
SusWrite 144
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 84%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 34GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 89.7
Write 88.8
Mixed 50.6
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 5
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback