Today's hottest deals

Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160215
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 07 '17 at 04:41
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$134
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 651
71% 560 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$170
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 112
Parallax 95.4
91% 106 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 101
Splatting 99.5
81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 486
Write 339
Mixed 334
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 9.54
57% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 9.12
13% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 107%
Mushkin MKNSSDCR240GB-G2 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 604ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 377
Write 214
Mixed 262
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 12.5
55% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 8.38
13% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 169
Write 68.3
Mixed 121
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.28
110% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$29
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $655
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback