Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 12:01
Run Duration368 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 294
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,026
94% 789 Pts
64-Core 1498
93% 1498 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 190
Parallax 197
139% 186 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 176
Splatting 125
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1913 1948 873 302 311 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,644
Write 2079
Mixed 1,738
SusWrite 940
361% 1,600 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 85.9
289% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,331
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 1,094
824% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 263%
Great: 295%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
331GB free
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 1334 1336 1337 1341 1368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,241
Write 1,318
Mixed 1,226
SusWrite 1344
342% 1,532 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 67.4
227% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 958
719% 952 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 284%
Great: 332%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
669GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 160 161 160 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 160
26% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1
10% 4.77 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 39%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
233GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 119
Write 47.2
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 89.1
18% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1.1
15% 5.63 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 1
3% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 39%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 186 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 184
Write 48.6
Mixed 72
SusWrite 185
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 1.1
66% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 1
3% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 39%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
465GB free
Firmware: SM28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 105 103 105 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 115
Write 79.8
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 104
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 2.3
430% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 64%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
25GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 77 81 79 81 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 126
Write 138
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 79.6
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
688GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 159 156 159 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 170
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 157
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
4GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 167
Mixed 34.1
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
12GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 185 182 186 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 131
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 180
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 171 168 172 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 146
Mixed 69
SusWrite 172
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 105%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
183GB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 185 191 188 191 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 110
Write 120
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 189
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.4
207% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 32.1
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 33.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,207
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback