Performance Results


Gaming 170% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 171% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7D06
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z590 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7D06) (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$236 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 148 2-Core 293 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 1,012 94% 787 Pts	64-Core 1,562 97% 1,562 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$630 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% EVGA(3842 3955) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	177% Outstanding	Lighting 236 Reflection 238 Parallax 292 193% 255 fps	MRender 336 Gravity 253 Splatting 185 203% 258 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB 5,658 User benchmarks, average bench 165% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 208 247 217 113 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 902 Write 235 Mixed 323 SusWrite 186 90% 412 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 35.9 138% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 640 DQ Mixed 58.4 146% 290 MB/s
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 246%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 194GB free Firmware: SBFA16.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 110 115 113 165 138 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.4% Very good	Read 266 Write 115 Mixed 232 SusWrite 148 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 37.1 130% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 203 174% 252 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 996GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 184 170 161 175 183 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 150 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 174 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB 54,117 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.9% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.6 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 20.4 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 187%

UFO

Desktop 106%

UFO

Workstation 187%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	399x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	287x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	177x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	96x
CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 85%, 54,117 samples	94x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	93x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,680

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16