Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 056847F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 056847F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161024
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 138
57% 95 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 239
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
7.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 10.8
7% 10 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 11
Splatting 9.7
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KW24 240GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 118 101 99 82 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 243
Write 177
Mixed 232
SusWrite 110
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 23.2
80% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 152
115% 153 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 158 158 162 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66% Good
Read 169
Write 113
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 157
171% 131 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
128% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C Samsung M391B1G73QH0- HMT351U7CFR8C 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 056847F Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 056847F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback