Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 23:40
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 170
2-Core 326
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 992
95% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,243
77% 1,243 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.5% Very good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 85.9
75% 90.1 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 80.4
Splatting 74.5
71% 89.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 297 297 296 297 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 452
Mixed 390
SusWrite 297
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 55.3
194% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 231
203% 304 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
842GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 147 148 147 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 135
Write 131
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 146
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 110
Write 100
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 111
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
828GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 36.5
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 41
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
156% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 65%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 20.7
Write 30.9
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 40.6
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$41
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback