Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C84
Motherboard	MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '22 at 08:00
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$159 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 73 1-Core 157 2-Core 290 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 793 81% 653 Pts	64-Core 973 60% 973 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Zotac(19DA 2617) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	156% Outstanding	Lighting 232 Reflection 221 Parallax 208 189% 220 fps	MRender 201 Gravity 160 Splatting 142 134% 168 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB 3,097 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 70 61 48 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 436 Write 228 Mixed 213 SusWrite 63.8 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 27.4 89% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 31 34% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 92%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 271GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 1001 1085 1088 1065 1046 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	259% Outstanding	Read 2,215 Write 1,926 Mixed 1,324 SusWrite 1,066 365% 1,633 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 73.6 227% 78.9 MB/s	DQ Read 60 DQ Write 1,478 DQ Mixed 76.7 267% 538 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 259% Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 166GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 149 147 148 148 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 152 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 150 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 5,076 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 13.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.9 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	618x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	515x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	264x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	343x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	179x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	152x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,429

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16