HP Pro 3505 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Pro 3505 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2ACF
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120622
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '22 at 20:20
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-3200 APU 802 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Memory 48.2 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 70.1 31% 50.2 Pts	4-Core 68.8 8-Core 70.6 9% 69.7 Pts	64-Core 69.7 4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 17.3 15% 17.8 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 15.7 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 16%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 214 Write 94.9 Mixed 123 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 22.6 81% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 92.8 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 99.4 76% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 20GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 25.2 Write 15.5 Mixed 16.9 23% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 60% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB 8,612 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 10.1 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pro 3505 Series Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3505 Series

CPU
E2-3200 APUAMDBench 34%, 802 samples	14x
A4-3420 APUAMDBench 36%, 1,139 samples	5x
A6-3620 APUAMDBench 41%, 2,758 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6370DAMDBench 2%, 517 samples	10x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
CT102464BD160B.C16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 16GBMicronBench 47%, 7 samples	2x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	2x
8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 2x2GBMicronBench 49%, 1,108 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16