| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141127 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 06 '22 at 14:15 |
| Run Duration | 412 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4170-$59
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
43.3%
Average
|
44% 70.9 Pts
|
15% 109 Pts
|
9% 149 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
13.1%
Very poor
|
14% 15.4 fps
|
12% 15.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 64 42 40 38 37 MB/s
|
56.6%
Above average
|
54% 243 MB/s
|
93% 32.5 MB/s
|
142% 218 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
106GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 31 31 31 31 28 MB/s
|
20%
Very poor
|
26% 34.8 MB/s
|
94% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
28.9%
Poor
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
18% 6.27 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,844 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 562x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 236x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 266x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 208x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 169x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $344 |