Bleujour KUBB-OCTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemBleujour KUBB-OCTO  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime8 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 08:53
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 155
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 282
32% 250 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 12
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 0.2
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$59
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 407 355 350 353 360 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,765
Write 1,490
Mixed 1,334
SusWrite 376
277% 1,241 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 57.7
200% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 621
462% 619 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 183%
Great: 238%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GF2.4000B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 24.2
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KUBB-OCTO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Bleujour KUBB-OCTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback