Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 128 66% 103 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 219 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 50 65 64 46 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 408 Write 113 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 60.4 35% 161 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 1.6 47% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 10.3 DQ Mixed 0.3 15% 38 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-10-9 DDR3-1866 8313 CL9-10-9 D3-1866 8313 CL9-10-9 DDR3-1866 8313 CL9-10-9 D3-1866 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 19.3 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	62x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $854

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16