Huanan To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardHuanan To Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 08:26
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5672
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 147
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 330
38% 295 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 10.6
8% 11.9 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 239 233 237 238 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.4% Very good
Read 247
Write 241
Mixed 229
SusWrite 237
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 36.6
119% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
387GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 155 158 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 111
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 159
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1600, 1600, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 19.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huanan To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback