LG A410-K.BE46P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLG A410-K.BE46P1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 22:14
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 390
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 52.9
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 114
45% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 154
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Device(1854 0847) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.2
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 106 118 125 117 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.3% Poor
Read 199
Write 121
Mixed 174
SusWrite 107
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 8.1
29% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 41.9
43% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
513GB free
Firmware: GT001L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 77 76 77 75 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 17.7
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 66.6
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RZX-D3D9M1333BL-4G HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.9% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A410-K.BE46P1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: LG A410-K.BE46P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback