Lenovo 30A10026MB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30A10026MB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 187
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 306
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.4
3% 4 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 421 428 424 384 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 441
Mixed 422
SusWrite 410
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 48.5
163% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 292
237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
730GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 177 178 177 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 159
Mixed 121
SusWrite 176
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Timetec UDIMM NP13 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5402-031.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A10026MB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30A10026MB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback