HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 24 months ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8643
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210917
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '22 at 22:31
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140 16,466 User benchmarks, average bench 81% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 79.3 1-Core 132 2-Core 264 86% 159 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 750 80% 637 Pts	64-Core 764 47% 764 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 55.5 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 49.5 45% 53.7 fps	MRender 42.7 Gravity 50.3 Splatting 46.2 38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GB 5,621 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0V23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 229 532 226 200 246 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,144 Write 1,036 Mixed 944 SusWrite 378 196% 876 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 87.6 4K Mixed 54.6 188% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 786 DQ Write 719 DQ Mixed 777 576% 761 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 187%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 864GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 197 200 199 197 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 185 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 198 111% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB 2,680 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 16.9 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500AMD $140Bench 81%, 16,466 samples	1,327x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	460x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	328x

GPU
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1,054x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	816x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	220x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 169%, 5,284 samples	232x
hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GBSKBench 146%, 8,367 samples	220x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	187x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	218x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	166x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16