Lenovo 80X8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80X8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 23:28
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 141
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 152
18% 141 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3987) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 6.4
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.8
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 947
Write 745
Mixed 365
151% 686 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 33
92% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 423
320% 438 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80X8 Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80X8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback