Microelectronics G225

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Microelectronics G225 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B360 Pro4
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190422
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '22 at 22:32
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 239 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 575 62% 493 Pts	64-Core 559 35% 559 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.9% Very good	Lighting 89.3 Reflection 88.7 Parallax 89 73% 89 fps	MRender 92 Gravity 85.1 Splatting 73.3 67% 83.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB 43,498 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 114 94 114 142 172 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 354 Write 240 Mixed 256 SusWrite 130 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 40.6 125% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 112 146% 264 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 270GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 111 118 121 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 98.5 Write 146 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 115 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GB 5,112 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	67.2% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 21.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G225 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

System: Microelectronics G225

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	115x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	92x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	3x

SSD
WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GBWDCBench 93%, 43,498 samples	53x
WDS500G2B0B 500GBWDCBench 96%, 11,733 samples	21x
MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	4x

RAM
GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 5,112 samples	73x
F4-3200C16-8GVKB 8945 GKE800UD102408-2666 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 8945 GKE800UD102408-2666 32GBUnknownBench 75%, 25 samples	11x
KHX2666C16/8G 8945 GKE800UD102408-2666 KHX2666C16/8G 8945 GKE800UD102408-2666 32GBKingstonBench 82%, 9 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 120% - Outstanding

Total price: $245

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16